Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512JA
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '21 at 00:13
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1005G1 22,960 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 76 1-Core 126 2-Core 232 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 313 41% 310 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1052) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.26% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 7.5 6% 6.9 fps	MRender 8.6 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 10 7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.26% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB 195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 177 179 171 171 168 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 1073 Write 350 Mixed 387 SusWrite 180 109% 498 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 41 193% 74.5 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 232 192% 273 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 126%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52 41,501 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 689GB free Firmware: JE4OA50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 89 89 91 90 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	52% Above average	Read 92.7 Write 94 Mixed 44.4 SusWrite 88.4 58% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB 575 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2667, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 23.7 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 35.4 SC Mixed 22.9 73% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1101 598	CMN15F5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_F512JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	221x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	67x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	13x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	288x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	13x

SSD
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBNvmeBench 99%, 195 samples	65x
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBBench 95%, 6,558 samples	61x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples	33x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 68%, 575 samples	77x
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBSamsungBench 66%, 495 samples	71x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 12GBMicronBench 58%, 249 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16