MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7996
Motherboard	MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996) (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180616
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '21 at 21:25
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 450 User benchmarks, average bench 75% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 199 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 592 60% 489 Pts	64-Core 633 39% 633 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% PNY(196E 119F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.8% Above average	Lighting 69.5 Reflection 72 Parallax 65.7 57% 69.1 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 68.5 Splatting 65.1 54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,982 Write 4456 Mixed 5865 1,142% 5,101 MB/s	4K Read 536 4K Write 297 4K Mixed 285 1,335% 373 MB/s	DQ Read 1,398 DQ Write 910 DQ Mixed 938 758% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 122GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 475 482 481 425 277 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 478 Mixed 385 SusWrite 435 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 67 4K Mixed 52.9 154% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 351 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 41GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 96 98 107 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 107 Write 96.7 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 105 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G1B1 Kingston 9905599-026.A00G 16GB 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.7% Good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 21 72% 25 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 18.4 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	100%	2	108	7	144	23.8"	1920 1080	AUS24AF ASUS VP249

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M PRO-D (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 2,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	518x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	344x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	341x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	432x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	341x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	236x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	142x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	57x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	43x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16