Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LX (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120214
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '17 at 09:57
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$194 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 184 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 476 49% 396 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 809D) CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.7.3 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Lighting 23.9 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 31.3 20% 28.7 fps	MRender 30 Gravity 23.3 Splatting 33.7 24% 29 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7909 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 507 (B1) Unknown 87 87 61 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 50 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 103 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10070032200	62.7% Good	Read 485 Write 270 Mixed 272 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 12.7 86% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 33.7 DQ Write 50.4 DQ Mixed 12.5 18% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 446GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 210674351 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6948 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 71 60 34469413990 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23405 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 37 2305 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 131077 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 47 656277541 (C2) HDA temperature 37 53 64424509477 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 23 210674351 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 93183610485556 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2836002608 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2849770947	59.1% Above average	Read 103 Write 103 Mixed 89.7 74% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.55 122% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 104GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 212190108 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5840 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 445751861 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 23672 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2153 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 90 67960 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 64 48 605814820 (C2) HDA temperature 36 52 55834574884 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 29 25 212190108 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -3861175569753 (F1) Unknown 100 253 567000554 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2253326540	41.9% Average	Read 76.1 Write 69.7 Mixed 74 55% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.38 94% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 647 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 17.5 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,406x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,166x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	1,071x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	375x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	366x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	302x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	214x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	196x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	149x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	105x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16