PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7592 |
Motherboard | MSI G41M-P26 (MS-7592) (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121210 |
Uptime | 3.4 Days |
Run Date | Aug 18 '21 at 08:31 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | GTM-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
55.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$37
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 109 112 69 75 73 MB/s
|
49.4%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 113 112 70 75 73 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 113 112 69 74 72 MB/s
|
69.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
787GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 113 112 69 74 72 MB/s
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 7 | 5 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | AUS24D1 ASUS VA24E |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples | 29x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 15x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 40x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 38% - Below average | Total price: $52 |