Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Memory 29.1 1-Core 48 2-Core 89.6 31% 55.6 Pts	4-Core 92.6 8-Core 87.1 12% 89.8 Pts	64-Core 93.3 6% 93.3 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1DC2 2503) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 2.1 2% 1.83 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SD Card 64GB 576 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 46GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 3.9 17 17 17 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 24.3 Write 21.7 Mixed 24 SusWrite 15.1 28% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1 72% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 4.7 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 260 15% 260 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
9%	3%	87	29	21	60	12.2"	1280 800	KDC0000

History: Score 2: 0R 0G 2B | Score 6: 0R 1G 3B | Score 22: 3R 2G 1B | Score 9: 1R 1G 1B

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16