Asus VivoBook 12_ASUS Laptop E203MAS_E203MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook 12_ASUS Laptop E203MAS_E203MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E203MAS
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190929
Uptime26.6 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 13:18
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Memory 18.9
1-Core 50.6
2-Core 67.7
26% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 74.2
8-Core 107
11% 90.4 Pts
64-Core 69.2
4% 69.2 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1201) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1.3
2% 1.5 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4F6E3S4HM-MGCJ 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.4
3% 1.03 GB/s
Latency 329
12% 329 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 5R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 19% 70 30 16 60 11.6" 1366 768 CMN1130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback