Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X415DAP
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210326
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '21 at 12:37
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics 5,719 User benchmarks, average bench 35% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 26.1 1-Core 72.2 2-Core 143 41% 80.5 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 192 21% 164 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 17,211 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1FAF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.45.44 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 1.9 1% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 4.1 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$44 6,626 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: P2CR012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 503 427 215 213 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 532 Mixed 523 SusWrite 339 107% 477 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 70.8 4K Mixed 48.7 154% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 174 146% 216 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 228%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 705GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 130 128 128 130 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 145 Write 123 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 128 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.6 226% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 1x4GB 7,475 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.8% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 13.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 9.7 23% 8.13 GB/s	Latency 279 14% 279 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
1%	2%	47	64	48	60	14"	1280 720	BOE07F6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415DAP_M415DA

CPU
Ryzen 3 3250U GraphicsAMDBench 38%, 10,258 samples	145x
Athlon Gold 3150U GraphicsAMDBench 45%, 2,359 samples	12x
Athlon Silver 3050U GraphicsAMDBench 35%, 5,719 samples	10x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 17,211 samples	152x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	15x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	58x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	42x
P900F128GH 128GBForeseeBench 86%, 300 samples	28x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 67%, 2,461 samples	40x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	38x
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 1x4GBMicronBench 35%, 7,475 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16