Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '21 at 01:53
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 67.5 2-Core 119 55% 88.6 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 387 37% 306 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.50.02 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45% Average	Lighting 56.2 Reflection 60.4 Parallax 75.8 46% 64.1 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 59.1 Splatting 43.9 43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 49%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JOYSSD256 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0817A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 444 Write 296 Mixed 360 81% 366 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 70.1 4K Mixed 21.8 103% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 42.9 78% 153 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 88%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 895GB free Firmware: JP4ONS01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 130 Write 85.1 Mixed 68.2 70% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 17GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 39.4 Mixed 31.1 27% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B1G73AH0-K0 4x8GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.1% Average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.5 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 12.1 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	32"	1280 701	MST0030 MStar Demo

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	289x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	228x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16