Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Positivo POSITIVO (all builds)
Motherboard	Desenvolvido P5VD2-MX
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070504
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '21 at 16:33
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2180-$130 7,312 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Memory 28.4 1-Core 3.7 2-Core 3.7 11% 11.9 Pts	4-Core 18.3 8-Core 43.9 4% 31.1 Pts	64-Core 44.2 3% 44.2 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingbank KP330 120G 120GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200326 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 2 2 3.2 1.7 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 6% Great: 47%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 1 0.6 1 0.9 4 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	8.52% Terrible	Read 25.4 Write 7.2 Mixed 6 SusWrite 1.6 10% 10 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.1 125% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.52% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.81% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.27 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.2 SC Mixed 0.7 3% 1.2 GB/s	Latency 264 15% 264 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.81% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	1	1	64	0"	1024 768

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X4 850AMDBench 49%, 1,360 samples	1x
Phenom 9750AMDBench 44%, 1,906 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x

SSD
120G 120GBWalramBench 61%, 259 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16