Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 TH-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z170X-UD5 TH
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 TH-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 15:37
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 265
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 644
69% 550 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
HP(103C 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 20.3
19% 23.8 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 22.7
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
15GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 208 140 107 105 106 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 197
Write 173
Mixed 130
SusWrite 146
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 13.1
46% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 141
104% 135 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 113%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$86
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 752 624 514 418 382 382 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 902
Write 966
Mixed 616
SusWrite 512
168% 749 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 47.8
154% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 602
441% 581 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 141%
Great: 372%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: FJ1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 151 153 145 145 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 59.2
Write 111
Mixed 52
SusWrite 148
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
179% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
274GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 64 64 63 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 50.8
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 63.2
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
941GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 110 108 101 105 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 63.3
Write 66.3
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 105
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 114 114 106 106 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 86.3
Write 76.2
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 109
57% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 84%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
275GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 133 127 125 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 75
Write 71.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 130
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 112%
Sony MRW-E90 66GB
60GB free, PID 0bae
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 108 101 100 98 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.9% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 50.3
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 97.7
86% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
42% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 31.8
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 32
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23" 1280 720 SAM0570 SyncMaster
Typical GA-Z170X-UD5 TH-CF Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 TH-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $1,530
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback