Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5200-$50 13,848 User benchmarks, average bench 36% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Memory 49.2 1-Core 30.5 2-Core 51.4 29% 43.7 Pts	4-Core 55.5 8-Core 56 8% 55.8 Pts	64-Core 60.6 4% 60.6 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset 16,152 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 3048) 1.5GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.32% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.32% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB 14,793 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN07373 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 162 148 103 104 105 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.6% Below average	Read 194 Write 197 Mixed 193 SusWrite 129 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 18.2 63% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 21.5 DQ Write 45.6 DQ Mixed 26.3 22% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 93%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 24GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 0.9 4 2.5 7.1 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.98% Terrible	Read 29.7 Write 14.2 Mixed 10.4 SusWrite 5.1 17% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 33% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.98% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	13% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16