Asus P5KPL-SE

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL-SE (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '21 at 21:37
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 80.3 1-Core 47.1 2-Core 95 48% 74.1 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 188 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2077 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Lighting 47.2 Reflection 44.3 Parallax 43.5 38% 45 fps	MRender 44.1 Gravity 46.2 Splatting 30.5 32% 40.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 236 237 234 242 242 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.9% Good	Read 250 Write 242 Mixed 202 SusWrite 232 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 34.4 126% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 35.2 DQ Write 97.1 DQ Mixed 40.4 38% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 128%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$48 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 39GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 59 Write 26.2 Mixed 36.9 SusWrite 63.7 34% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 6.8 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 6.6 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	52"	1280 720	GSM0001 LG TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL-SE Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-SE

CPU
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	16x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	9x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	9x

GPU
GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 12,718 samples	17x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	16x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	11x

SSD
SDM8SI240A 240GBBench 54%, 398 samples	3x
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	3x
AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples	3x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	92x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	17x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16