PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7522 |
Motherboard | MSI X58 PLATINUM(MS-7522) (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 10.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090420 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 13 '21 at 20:53 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | ARG-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HS-SSD-C100 240GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 43 44 43 46 47 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
379GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 47 47 47 47 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
27GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 57 55 55 62 MB/s
|
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 46GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 36864 MB
|
30%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 40" | 1280 720 | SAM0C39 SAMSUNG |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 22x |
Core i7 975Intel $550Bench 72%, 3,143 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $194 |