Supermicro AVIOR-1F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro AVIOR-1F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8ST3-SM005
Memory7.1 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110810
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateAug 05 '17 at 05:08
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 129
58% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 362
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 54.7
50% 59.5 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 58.1
Splatting 60.3
49% 60.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 240
Write 171
Mixed 175
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 6.48
33% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 14.5
DQ Mixed 6.89
10% 18.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST3450857SS 450GB
334GB free
Firmware: ES01
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 183
Mixed 185
139% 185 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.6
146% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HUS153073VLS300 73GB
193GB free
Firmware: A410
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 115
Write 113
Mixed 106
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.53
127% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 66%
Hitachi HUS153073VLS300 73GB
193GB free
Firmware: A410
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 114
Write 116
Mixed 111
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.54
128% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%
Hitachi HUS153073VLS300 73GB
193GB free
Firmware: A410
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 107
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.54
125% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ATMEL 26DF321 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback