Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H87-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 19:07
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 108
2-Core 187
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 567
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB; RTX3070
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 213
Parallax 207
181% 214 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 158
Splatting 138
133% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 89 66 59 55 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 436
Mixed 349
SusWrite 85.8
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 46.6
169% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 230
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 118%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 335 425 413 425 419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 432
Mixed 347
SusWrite 370
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 35.6
142% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 249
208% 302 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
107GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 247 277 277 276 277 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 438
Mixed 395
SusWrite 259
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 46.6
167% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 232
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 118%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
341GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 126 132 237 203 253 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 391
Write 290
Mixed 224
SusWrite 185
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 5.7
52% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 24.3
33% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
809GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 68
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 73.8
80% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 3R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 30% 30 259 184 60 24.1" 1920 1200 DELA07B DELL U2412M
Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $298
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback