HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 9470m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190412
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '21 at 02:31
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3437U 3,817 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 66.8 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 136 56% 93.8 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 191 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18DF) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.67% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 2 Parallax 3 5% 3.87 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.67% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256M6M-HP 256GB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: DM81701 SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 376 325 362 361 340 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 418 Write 326 Mixed 272 SusWrite 354 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 20 74% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 194 172% 259 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 88%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 451GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 466 439 450 435 296 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 449 Write 416 Mixed 405 SusWrite 422 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 31.4 106% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 329 248% 331 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.2 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 9: 1R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
9%	5%	91	31	20	40	14"	1366 768	CMN14A4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

CPU
Core i5-3437UIntelBench 49%, 3,817 samples	339x
Core i5-3427UIntelBench 49%, 4,182 samples	312x
Core i7-3687UIntelBench 53%, 2,933 samples	171x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	950x
Ivy 4PhdgdBench 4%, 153 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	65x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	41x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	27x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	28x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	25x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16