Wortmann_ag 1009617;2110182

Performance Results


Gaming 159% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 179% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Wortmann_ag 1009617;2110182 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME X299-A II
Memory	57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '21 at 10:22
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900X 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 73.1 1-Core 149 2-Core 296 92% 173 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 1,080 90% 782 Pts	64-Core 1,643 102% 1,643 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Asus(1043 87EB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	194% Outstanding	Lighting 283 Reflection 251 Parallax 284 230% 272 fps	MRender 323 Gravity 237 Splatting 175 192% 245 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB 21,743 User benchmarks, average bench 345% 599GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXA7301Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1829 1782 1821 1669 1695 1659 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	284% Outstanding	Read 1,863 Write 2,076 Mixed 2,233 SusWrite 1,743 448% 1,979 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 72.5 255% 97.1 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 786 DQ Mixed 383 340% 495 MB/s
Poor: 192% ↑ This bench: 284% Great: 444%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 954GB free Firmware: RVM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 421 417 419 419 423 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 386 Write 460 Mixed 433 SusWrite 420 96% 424 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 36.1 132% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 28.9 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 185 111% 114 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 132%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 4x16GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 49 MC Mixed 32 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 10 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 94.5 42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 147%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	1	3	1	60	23.8"	1280 720	WOR2462 Terra 2462W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 1009617;2110182 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 116%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 126%

UFO

System: Wortmann_ag 1009617;2110182

CPU
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	4x
Core i9-10940XIntelBench 86%, 1,827 samples	4x

GPU
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	3x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	2x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	1x

SSD
MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TBSamsungBench 391%, 3,483 samples	2x
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 310%, 6,250 samples	2x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	2x

RAM
M378A2K43EB1-CWE 4x16GBSamsungBench 99%, 130 samples	2x
M378A4G43AB2-CWE 8x31.9GBSamsungBench 134%, 35 samples	2x
M378A2G43AB3-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 90%, 2,006 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16