Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120502
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 96.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 203 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 346 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435 6,727 User benchmarks, average bench 36% AMD(1002 3000) 3GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.7.4 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34% Below average	Lighting 44.8 Reflection 35.6 Parallax 56.9 36% 45.8 fps	MRender 32.2 Gravity 50.5 Splatting 26.7 29% 36.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB 3,736 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 350 343 279 341 405 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 266 Write 172 Mixed 193 SusWrite 342 55% 243 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 12.4 56% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 124 117% 187 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 108%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 237GB free Firmware: 03.M0300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 53 59 56 54 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 16.5 Write 52.2 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 55.1 28% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.1 32% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 8634 SUPERTALENT02 8634 SUPERTALENT 8634 SUPERTALENT 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	61.6% Good	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 20.3 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 51.9 77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	826x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	553x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	316x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	138x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	125x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	72x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	69x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	61x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	59x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $855

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16