Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime24.3 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 17:38
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 32.5
2-Core 66.5
38% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 295
25% 214 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.2% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 62.5
49% 64.3 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 55.6
50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 143 144 138 144 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 456
Write 439
Mixed 342
SusWrite 168
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 27
88% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 142
107% 143 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 115%
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
147GB free
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 607 676 866 184 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 1,130
Write 887
Mixed 851
SusWrite 448
185% 829 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 25.6
86% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 159
119% 159 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 106%
Great: 192%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
367GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 127 139 139 139 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 36.7
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 137
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 17.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 2R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 4% 91 108 5 60 23.8" 1920 1080 HWP3320 HP 24es
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback