Acer Predator GX-792

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Acer Predator GX-792 (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Viper2_KLS
Memory	50.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180926
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '21 at 04:29
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%
CPU Throttled	96%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820HK 18,903 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 158 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 478 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile) 17,197 User benchmarks, average bench 95% Acer(1025 1146) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.2% Very good	Lighting 90.3 Reflection 122 Parallax 103 74% 105 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 104 Splatting 101 84% 103 fps
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 575 440 416 411 410 404 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	185% Outstanding	Read 1676 Write 1,218 Mixed 700 SusWrite 443 224% 1,009 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 58.4 194% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 778 DQ Write 593 DQ Mixed 693 516% 688 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 302%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB 5,890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 15 16 16 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.1% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 25.3 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 23 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	34.1"	1280 720	ACR054F Acer X34 P

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator GX-792 Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

System: Acer Predator GX-792

CPU
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	115x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples	166x

SSD
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 191%, 18,578 samples	33x
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples	30x
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples	18x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	31x
ACR24D4S7D8MB-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 77%, 566 samples	18x
ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 84%, 762 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16