Toshiba SATELLITE L735

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 34% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L735  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 09 '21 at 22:30
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 50%
CPU Throttled 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 15.3
2-Core 27.7
26% 34 Pts
4-Core 42.6
8-Core 46
6% 44.3 Pts
64-Core 46.4
3% 46.4 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FCC0) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.63 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 203 199 204 200 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.3% Below average
Read 158
Write 100
Mixed 80
SusWrite 198
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 9.3
36% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 8.1
DQ Write 25.4
DQ Mixed 22.6
16% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 102%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 4 3.7 2.4 4.8 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Read 25
Write 5.2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.7
10% 9.98 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L735 Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L735

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback