Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '21 at 19:41
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 155
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 290
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Zotac(19DA 5194) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.94% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 11.9
9% 13.3 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 12
11% 14 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 184 185 125 122 119 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 191
Write 169
Mixed 175
SusWrite 150
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 13.9
63% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 18.7
23% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
350GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 113 103 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 65
SusWrite 107
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
117GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 20
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 23.1
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 IVM661C PLX2783H-DP
Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback