HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Indio
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100303
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '21 at 15:54
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 79.2 2-Core 151 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 271 36% 273 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3530) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.4 0% 0.47 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 455GB free Firmware: 0117 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.84% Terrible	Read 32.9 Write 27 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 13 6% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 7.4 25% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 9.84% Great: 129%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 215GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 66 62 66 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 64.2 Write 79.6 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 64.5 43% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 62%
WD WD7500AZEX-00ZF5A0 750GB 1,942 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 365GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 135 133 134 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 131 Write 123 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 133 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 93%
TDK LoR TF10 32GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 27GB free, PID 0710 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4.1 5.5 5.5 4 5.1 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Read 13.9 Write 3.2 Mixed 7 SusWrite 4.5 8% 7.15 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 20%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 1TB 701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 820GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 10 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	6.67% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 19.5 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 10.9 22% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.67% Great: 21%
WD My Passport 259F 3TB 1,516 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 704GB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 20.5 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 22.4 30% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 49%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB 6,646 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 23.1 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 11.1 28% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
AD80AD80 HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 4x2GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 14.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 12.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	23.5"	1280 720	PHLC036 Philips 244E

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	49x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	41x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	39x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	29x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBCE80CE80Bench 39%, 417 samples	7x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 8GBAD80AD80Bench 42%, 11 samples	7x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBCE80CE80Bench 38%, 285 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16