Acer Nitro AN515-51

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Nitro AN515-51 (all builds)
Motherboard	KBL Freed_KLS
Memory	3.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190315
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '21 at 22:37
Run Duration	306 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 92.1 2-Core 155 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 305 37% 285 Pts	64-Core 383 24% 383 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.2% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 38.7 Parallax 37.2 28% 37 fps	MRender 33.7 Gravity 35.5 Splatting 23.3 24% 30.8 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 31%
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 118A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	5.33% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 7 4% 5.8 fps	MRender 8.8 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 10.5 7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.33% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB 6,771 User benchmarks, average bench 195% 303GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFM00E2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 516 404 320 368 491 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 202 Write 468 Mixed 161 SusWrite 398 70% 307 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 21.4 81% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 561 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 219 205% 329 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 270%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 632GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 55 50 50 54 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 104 Write 104 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 54.1 60% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.2 117% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 79%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 387GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 80 80 76 71 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 88.2 Write 77.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 76.3 89% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 45%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 4,473 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 377GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.5 7.3 7.9 7.4 7.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 83.2 Write 78.7 Mixed 31 SusWrite 7.5 61% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 52%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 6,353 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 509GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 30 37 34 34 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 11.3 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 31 28% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 57%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 3,626 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 546GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 34 32 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 32.3 Write 34.2 Mixed 28 SusWrite 35.5 45% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.5 121% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AO1P21FC8T1-BSKS 04CD F4-2133C15-8GRS 16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.6% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 18.9 58% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 16.8 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 13: 0R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
13%	20%	45	235	114	75	23.8"	1920 1080	KTC2400 WD238V02

History: Score 7: 0R 0G 7B | Score 13: 0R 2G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro AN515-51 Builds (Compare 3,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-51

CPU
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	2,221x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,585x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,115x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	974x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	715x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	676x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	405x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 4,820 samples	89x

RAM
AO1P21FC8T1-BSKS 1x8GBAdataBench 34%, 7,945 samples	415x
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,593 samples	233x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	193x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16