Asus PRIME A320M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-A (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	6.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '21 at 20:39
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 60.3 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 168 61% 109 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 412 57% 420 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 876B) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.20 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Lighting 14.5 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 19.8 12% 16.2 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 15 Splatting 12.6 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 91 84 79 74 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 430 Write 463 Mixed 285 SusWrite 105 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 62.8 4K Mixed 39.8 135% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 323 252% 346 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 110GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 102 101 106 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 151 Write 159 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 102 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 4x4GB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 29.6 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 23.6 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 34: 5R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
34%	12%	83	93	49	60	57.8"	1920 1080	TSB3700 32FHD_LCD_TV

History: Score 17: 2R 2G 1B | Score 34: 5R 2G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-A Builds (Compare 543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-A

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	68x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	60x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	40x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	38x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	13x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	10x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $284

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16