To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '17 at 19:38
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 48.7
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 200
61% 116 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 794
70% 597 Pts
64-Core 1,505
93% 1,505 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1597 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 126
Parallax 118
94% 120 fps
MRender 99.7
Gravity 108
Splatting 98.3
83% 102 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S 240GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 520
Write 326
Mixed 397
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 8.77
89% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 9.04
60% 142 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174
1TB free
Firmware: CC13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 126
Write 105
Mixed 114
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.48
108% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$22
851GB free
Firmware: SN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 161
Mixed 164
127% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.04
4K Mixed 0.55
175% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 103%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
129GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 76.1
Mixed 64.6
90% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.19
54% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer AQD-D3L8GN16- 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 31.9
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback