Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201014
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '21 at 02:19
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	93%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 33.9 1-Core 45 2-Core 44.7 26% 41.2 Pts	4-Core 77 8-Core 130 13% 104 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 872A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.3% Good	Lighting 82.3 Reflection 76.2 Parallax 82.8 67% 80.4 fps	MRender 98.8 Gravity 73.3 Splatting 61.6 62% 77.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 151 3.3 75 40 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 300 Write 262 Mixed 257 SusWrite 93.8 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 12.7 48% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 47.4 83% 161 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 851GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 150 178 173 165 176 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 158 Mixed 74.4 SusWrite 151 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905713-019.A00G 2x4GB 727 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 30: 2R 4G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
30%	22%	64	34	10	60	27"	1920 1080	SAM0D32 C27F390

History: Score 13: 2R 0G 3B | Score 30: 2R 4G 8B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	237x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	159x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	153x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	373x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	96x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	76x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	97x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	92x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	81x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	111x
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 51,435 samples	97x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $646

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16