Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime13.1 Days
Run DateAug 05 '21 at 04:18
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 217
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 537
61% 476 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
MSI(1462 3791) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.9% Good
Lighting 83.7
Reflection 80.3
Parallax 70.3
68% 78.1 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 67.1
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 102 26 9.7 18 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 402
Write 339
Mixed 280
SusWrite 63.4
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 6.6
49% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 76.7
DQ Mixed 33.2
31% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
35GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 52 65 35 25 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 17.4
Mixed 16
SusWrite 37.9
18% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 2647 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 111 107 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 73.1
Write 115
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 109
130% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.8
260% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 17
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 5R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 30% 33 7 6 60 31.5" 1280 720 HPN351A HP 32 Display
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $438
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback