Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 18:48
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 94
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 361
45% 345 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.7% Good
Lighting 88
Reflection 80.2
Parallax 73.3
72% 80.5 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 76.9
Splatting 69.4
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 180 148 159 158 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 321
Write 227
Mixed 252
SusWrite 159
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 34.3
118% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 43.1
42% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
102GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 89 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 106
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 89.5
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
595GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 110 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 109
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 50% 2 106 6 60 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7F1C BenQ RL2455
Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback