Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	92% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '21 at 17:26
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$295 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 125 2-Core 299 93% 172 Pts	4-Core 597 8-Core 1,028 98% 812 Pts	64-Core 1,614 100% 1,614 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2068) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 131 Parallax 113 94% 120 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 100 Splatting 95.3 89% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1176 1619 1486 1273 908 878 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	297% Outstanding	Read 2,551 Write 2,402 Mixed 1,831 SusWrite 1,223 448% 2,002 MB/s	4K Read 57.2 4K Write 83 4K Mixed 76.7 229% 72.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,174 DQ Write 968 DQ Mixed 1,066 800% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 297% Great: 410%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 17GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 316 316 254 281 289 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 494 Write 175 Mixed 272 SusWrite 297 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 65.5 4K Mixed 28 106% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 96.3 DQ Mixed 136 116% 176 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 5GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 84 97 97 88 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 74.8 Write 68.6 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 86.5 50% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 84%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 42GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 58 92 97 103 103 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 111 Write 106 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 90.1 74% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 77%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 29GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 67 67 68 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 98.1 Write 98.6 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 68.2 61% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 67%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 18GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 65 64 65 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 62.4 Write 61 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 63.7 46% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 89,024 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 31.1 102% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 45.4 SC Mixed 31.1 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	7	144	24.5"	1280 720	AOC2590 2590G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $275

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	771x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	612x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	482x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	207x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	186x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	166x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	151x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	123x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	82x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $872

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16