Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 1,588 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 221 79% 140 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 568 57% 462 Pts	64-Core 569 35% 569 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000M 731 User benchmarks, average bench 34% HP(103C 8109) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1013 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.96 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.6% Below average	Lighting 41.3 Reflection 44.2 Parallax 38.4 34% 41.3 fps	MRender 50.4 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 43.8 36% 44.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 14,022 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 367GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57HA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 865 1063 1157 1224 1291 1160 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,021 Write 975 Mixed 716 SusWrite 1,127 216% 960 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 19.1 4K Mixed 52.1 135% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 977 DQ Write 692 DQ Mixed 598 511% 756 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 235%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 691GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 116 117 117 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 126 Write 120 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 116 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 71%
General UDisk 8GB 7,759 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 11 11 8 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	6.45% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 6 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 9.8 10% 9 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.45% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CPB M474A2K43BB1-CRC 32GB 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.5% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 23.1 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 30.1 SC Mixed 23.2 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
17%	11%	46	108	4	60	17.2"	1920 1080	CMN1738

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	629x
Quadro M3000MNvidiaBench 27%, 1,726 samples	287x
Quadro M4000MNvidiaBench 34%, 731 samples	96x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	73x
MTFDDAV512TBN-1AR15ABHA 512GBCrucialBench 78%, 710 samples	58x
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples	53x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	73x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	72x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	43x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16