Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170825
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 15:48
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 667
64% 530 Pts
64-Core 835
52% 835 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 29
19% 19.8 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 19.7
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 210 214 205 207 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 478
Mixed 371
SusWrite 232
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 50.3
164% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 351
267% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
398GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 170 167 166 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 5.5
Write 58.2
Mixed 4
SusWrite 168
42% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABU032W 320GB
123GB free
Firmware: FN001S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 83 82 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 75.2
Write 74.6
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 83.8
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Predator 2666 C13 2x8GB-$137
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 29
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 24 72.3" 1280 701 PIO0000 VSX-924
Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $398
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback