Asrock H77M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H77M  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130809
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 14:59
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 165
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 312
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 052F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 35.3
20% 29 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 28
Splatting 24.2
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.U
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 465
Write 448
Mixed 222
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 28.1
79% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 64.4
DQ Mixed 69.9
88% 164 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
930GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 113 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 112
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 62GB
58GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 87 86 87 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 8R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 30% 50 85 4 144 23.8" 1920 1080 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
History: Score 17: 1R 3G 3B | Score 51: 8R 2G 5B
Typical H77M Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback