HP 550-127c

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 550-127c (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B35
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151023
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '21 at 13:40
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Memory 41.6 1-Core 54.2 2-Core 100 38% 65.3 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 153 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 2B35) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2501.0 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	5.3% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 7.5 Parallax 12.9 5% 8.9 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 9.5 Splatting 6.9 6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.3% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 2.5 63 71 76 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 351 Write 52.3 Mixed 111 SusWrite 52.5 31% 142 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 17.2 72% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 34.7 DQ Mixed 50.5 43% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 912GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 170 178 180 179 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 110 Mixed 108 SusWrite 165 108% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 5GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 10 9.6 9.2 10 10 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 21.1 Write 5.2 Mixed 6.2 SusWrite 9.8 12% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.7 116% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 10.3 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.2 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	23.5"	1280 720	ACR0424 Acer V246HQL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 550-127c Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP 550-127c

CPU
A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 41%, 15,719 samples	20x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	15x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
SDEZS25-240G-Z01 240GBBench 43%, 706 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
OSSD256GBTSS2 256GBBench 63%, 208 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,002 samples	8x
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	3x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 9,029 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16