Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1800 187 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Memory 66.1 1-Core 22 2-Core 43.8 32% 44 Pts	4-Core 45.7 8-Core 43.9 6% 44.8 Pts	64-Core 43.4 3% 43.4 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 7ED4) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0200Sf10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 131 144 164 180 80 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.3% Average	Read 212 Write 215 Mixed 177 SusWrite 148 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 19.2 59% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 107 82% 111 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MS3512NSZ-CA3G1 1x4GB 530 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J1800IntelBench 30%, 187 samples	32x
Celeron J1800IntelBench 30%, 5,848 samples	11x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	43x

RAM
MS3512NSZ-CA3G1 1x4GBUnknownBench 21%, 530 samples	21x
SH564128FH8NZQNSCR 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 173 samples	3x
MS301GNSA-CA3G1 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 112 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16