Asus H61M-A/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-A/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '17 at 05:07
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 94.4 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 162 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 227 31% 228 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1290 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Lighting 63.4 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 89.8 52% 73.3 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 61.9 Splatting 54.7 49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8269 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2894 (B1) Unknown 93 93 80 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 81 81 18650 (EB) Unknown 99 99 204 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13071696160	44.5% Average	Read 263 Write 132 Mixed 97.8 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 9.37 66% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 27 55% 113 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: MN6OA5C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 97 97 6 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 84 (03) Spinup time 134 134 34387722670 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 417 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 25 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 39833 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 318 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 515 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 515 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 201864249372 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	87.4% Excellent	Read 156 Write 148 Mixed 104 101% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.47 129% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 85%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 175GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 196 90 45832 (03) Spinup time 143 140 3841 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2647 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9718 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1882 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 513 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2133 (C2) HDA temperature 116 96 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 2	58.2% Above average	Read 99.2 Write 103 Mixed 104 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.38 98% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 60%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 0GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free, PID 0745 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	8.71% Terrible	Read 18 Write 16.3 Mixed 15.7 21% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.55 4K Write 0.63 4K Mixed 0.54 49% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 8.71% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.4% Good	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 19.5 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 18.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 58.7 68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-A/USB3 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A/USB3

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	26x
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples	22x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	22x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
HX128GSSDSATA3 128GBBench 60%, 235 samples	4x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	4x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
99U5474-026.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 1,756 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16