Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH551
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 11:27
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 256
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 699
70% 567 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2009) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 84.1
Reflection 101
Parallax 82.6
68% 89.1 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 95.6
74% 89.3 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 96%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 86 88 87 87 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,408
Write 59.9
Mixed 139
SusWrite 85.5
89% 423 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 32.9
128% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 957
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 147
201% 395 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 124%
Great: 234%
WDC WDS 100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
36GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 353 355 359 363 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 310
Write 346
Mixed 276
SusWrite 340
72% 318 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 26.7
87% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 93.3
DQ Write 98.8
DQ Mixed 75.8
63% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 23.8
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 26.2
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 7R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 19% 81 109 6 300 15.5" 1536 864 AUODE8E
Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback