PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20210521 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 04 '21 at 11:18 |
Run Duration | 181 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 81% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
55.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.59
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
KingFast 1TB
735GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0326A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 58 30 69 74 MB/s
|
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 500GB-$80
300GB free
Firmware: SHM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 170 139 152 151 156 MB/s
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 170 174 174 173 169 MB/s
|
94.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
24GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 7.2 11 9.9 10 11 MB/s
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
ADATA HD830 4TB
116GB free, PID a84a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 37 39 45 46 58 MB/s
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
57.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,239x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,036x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 861x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 740x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 376x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 223x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |