Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Q87M-E  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 08:00
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 205
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 583
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37% Below average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 61.3
39% 51.9 fps
MRender 45.2
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 32.5
34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel S3500 Series 240GB-$135
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0370
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 253 269 245 226 225 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 313
Write 79.7
Mixed 242
SusWrite 248
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 30.7
116% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 240
187% 259 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
572GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 186 190 190 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 180
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 188
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
939GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 112 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 111
Write 101
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 111
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 1337 FLGG45F-D8 9905471-084.A00LF 1337 FLGG45F-D8 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 8R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 32% 41 298 229 60 23.1" 1920 1080 GSM59AB 24EA53
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 37: 2R 6G 9B | Score 38: 3R 5G 8B | Score 49: 8R 2G 3B
Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $389
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback