Asus H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150602
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '21 at 13:32
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 194 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 374 50% 374 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 2456) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 46.2 Parallax 37.4 29% 39.7 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 26.6 27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 63 110 38 104 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 466 Write 280 Mixed 289 SusWrite 87.7 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 20.7 50% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 45.6 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 183 110% 113 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 90%
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$31 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 215GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 423 424 353 354 350 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 483 Mixed 449 SusWrite 381 102% 456 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 63.2 209% 71.8 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 362 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 99U5471-039.A00LF 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	60.2% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 18.2 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 19.7 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 46: 5R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
46%	11%	148	278	207	60	23.5"	1920 1080	ACR074D KG241Q S

History: Score 10: 0R 3G 1B | Score 46: 5R 5G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	460x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	299x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	201x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	172x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16