Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK S  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151027
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 16:43
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 236
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 696
68% 558 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 196
Parallax 185
147% 187 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 187
Splatting 131
123% 152 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 158 156 159 142 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 467
Write 315
Mixed 344
SusWrite 159
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 42.2
139% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 311
237% 320 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
223GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 427 455 467 473 471 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 453
Mixed 385
SusWrite 450
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 44.3
155% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 340
254% 336 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
36GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 101
Write 81.6
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 55.2
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
6GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 87 81 82 81 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 78.6
Write 77.3
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 87.8
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 6.4 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 10
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 8.9
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1632 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 37.5" 1280 720 AUS3831 ASUS MX38V
Typical SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK S Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $942
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback