Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200715
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 10:51
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 149
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 585
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 937
58% 937 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.8% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 130
Parallax 122
96% 123 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 123
Splatting 109
93% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 177 175 165 166 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 436
Write 418
Mixed 382
SusWrite 176
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 33.9
115% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 345
257% 341 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 111%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
272GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 77 94 76 95 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 127
Write 124
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 86.8
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.2
109% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 79%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 153 155 162 162 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 140
Write 170
Mixed 109
SusWrite 159
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.8
417% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3000C16-16GISB 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 144 27" 1280 720 ACR0623 KG271U
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $338
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback