Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca) 2,180 User benchmarks, average bench 34% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	32.9% Below average	Memory 45.9 1-Core 33 2-Core 66.3 30% 48.4 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 110 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 106 7% 106 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0800) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 2.9 2% 2.9 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.7 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 252 343 345 352 374 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 436 Write 370 Mixed 368 SusWrite 324 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 31.9 85% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 123%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 2.9 14 13 14 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 27.6 Write 1.5 Mixed 19 SusWrite 10.9 17% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.8 117% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB 8,612 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 7.1 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.2 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	60	21.5"	1280 720	GSM5818 E2241

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16