Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 09:09
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 200
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 585
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3826 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.1% Very good
Lighting 87.2
Reflection 110
Parallax 72.2
71% 89.8 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 85
Splatting 76.9
74% 92.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
807GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 300 393 428 429 400 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 467
Write 328
Mixed 386
SusWrite 383
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 25.6
90% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 100
116% 193 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 102%
Team T2535T120G 120GB
37GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 49 56 45 45 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 431
Write 384
Mixed 346
SusWrite 64.2
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 28.5
129% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 46.7
94% 186 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
801GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 107 150 149 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 110
Write 123
Mixed 12.9
SusWrite 140
69% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
52GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 20 22 22 22 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 21.2
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 20
34% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.7
175% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 24.4
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 21.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $218
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback