Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 07:00
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 244
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 621
73% 565 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3531 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67% Good
Lighting 81
Reflection 102
Parallax 66.8
66% 83.2 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 77.3
Splatting 71.1
69% 86.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
711GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 411 415 402 416 406 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 401
Write 317
Mixed 340
SusWrite 404
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 21
87% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 88.9
105% 175 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 102%
Team T2535T120G 120GB
36GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 59 40 49 53 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 446
Write 408
Mixed 366
SusWrite 56.1
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 1.2
91% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 40.6
61% 115 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
800GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 143 142 146 145 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 105
Write 139
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 143
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
52GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 22.5
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 22
35% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.8
190% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 23.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $218
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback