Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_A409JA

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_A409JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X409JA
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210112
Uptime	13.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '21 at 00:58
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1005G1 22,960 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 57.5 1-Core 47.4 2-Core 121 44% 75.3 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 260 30% 236 Pts	64-Core 245 15% 245 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1EB1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	4.07% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 5.3 3% 4.1 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 8.2 6% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.07% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 114 172 194 184 182 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 662 Write 256 Mixed 278 SusWrite 170 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 27.7 4K Mixed 26.5 73% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 490 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 294 233% 333 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 153%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 10 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 4.2 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	7	60	13.9"	1280 720	CMN14D6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_A409JA Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_A409JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	18x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	3x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	21x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	3x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	2x
TM8FP6512G 512GBTeamBench 195%, 6,771 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples	4x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	4x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16