Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200811
Uptime	8.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '21 at 23:18
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 86.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 213 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 637 67% 538 Pts	64-Core 646 40% 646 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 8753) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.9% Above average	Lighting 64 Reflection 122 Parallax 81.3 52% 89.2 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 79 Splatting 70.2 69% 86.6 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2001T 1TB 11,283 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1230A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 72 76 5.1 2.1 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 484 Write 326 Mixed 70.6 SusWrite 38.6 50% 230 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.3 41% 9.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 105%
Team T253E2001T 1TB 971 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 942GB free Firmware: T0910A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 484 Write 377 Mixed 386 92% 415 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 77.9 4K Mixed 29.3 123% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 51.2 74% 137 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 99,207 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 36.7 MC Mixed 32.6 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 25.4 SC Write 40.8 SC Mixed 28.3 90% 31.5 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 63: 6R 6G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
63%	68%	40	307	241	144	23.8"	1920 1080	AOC2490 G2490W1G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4S Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 126%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 119%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	79x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	64x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	34x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	32x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	22x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	10x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $41Bench 89%, 87,344 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $641

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16