Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 18:06
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 746
78% 627 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 106
Parallax 109
96% 111 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 90.5
86% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 64 95 22 69 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 177
Write 287
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 65.3
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 30.1
55% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 96.6
117% 202 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 100%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
87GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 165 166 162 168 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 94.7
Write 90
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 164
24% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.5
8% 3.53 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 0.9
2% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 23%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
42GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 99 102 106 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 92
Write 98.7
Mixed 72
SusWrite 103
68% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 25
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 27
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 70: 8R 7G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
70% 30% 80 348 288 144 23.5" 1920 1080 MSI3EA2 MSI MAG241C
History: Score 32: 3R 3G 8B | Score 70: 8R 7G 9B
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $260
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback