Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 17:51
Run Duration432 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 896
90% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 99.3
Reflection 112
Parallax 99.9
81% 104 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 100
80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
797GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1686 1739 1619 1528 1474 1516 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 2,590
Write 1,866
Mixed 1,728
SusWrite 1,594
435% 1,945 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 94
310% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 1,133
849% 1,133 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 348%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
272GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 456 454 460 437 453 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 468
Mixed 422
SusWrite 452
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 57.9
191% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 204
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
198GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 459 460 459 459 459 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 467
Mixed 438
SusWrite 459
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 60.7
199% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 204
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
236GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1175 828 829 830 829 830 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,052
Write 2,272
Mixed 1,731
SusWrite 887
390% 1,735 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 77.7
280% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,237
DQ Write 1,067
DQ Mixed 1,132
854% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 274%
Great: 288%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
444GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 156 157 160 160 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 105
Write 107
Mixed 31
SusWrite 156
72% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
207% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 75%
Great: 87%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 109 114 112 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 79.5
Write 126
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 113
74% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
206% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 65%
WD Game Drive 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 111 110 109 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 125
Write 110
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 110
142% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.8
244% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 65%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
19GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6.8 6.8 6.9 6.8 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 7.2
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 8.2
17% 14 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 33.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 35.6
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 5R 6G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
46% 52% 27 350 290 60 27" 1920 1080 HPN354B HP 27f
History: Score 23: 2R 3G 4B | Score 46: 5R 6G 3B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback