Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 14:56
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 50.2
2-Core 100
48% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 201
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 350
Sapphire(174B A013) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 17.2
10% 15.7 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 11.6
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST332081 3AS 320GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 23 15 30 49 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 110
Write 96.2
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 31.4
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 65%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
159GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 16 33 51 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 67.5
Write 82.9
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 33
35% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
69GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 16 33 51 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 163
Write 147
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 33
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 113%
Toshiba MK7575GSX 750GB-$63
96GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 67 70 70 70 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 79
Write 70.2
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 66.8
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
304GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 67 70 70 70 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 72.1
Write 66.6
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 66.8
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
86GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 16 34 51 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 26.6
Write 50.7
Mixed 36.1
SusWrite 33
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 12.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 46.9" 1280 701 VIZ4710 M470VT
Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback